Gaps AEM Inside can close with embedded identity, evidence and verifiable reports.

• No policy-defined operational evidence

  Critical events are not captured as structured evidence, so there is little to review after an incident.

• Evidence is not tamper-resistant

  Without tamper resistance, evidence can be altered and is discounted in insurance review.

• Incident evidence is not captured

  Anomalies and incidents leave no reliable evidence trail, weakening claims and reviews.

• Weak credential protection

  Shared or static credentials undermine attribution and are a common insurance-review blocker.

• No trusted time on evidence

  Evidence lacks trustworthy timestamps, so the sequence of events cannot be relied upon.

• Evidence can be altered after capture

  Editable records cannot be trusted as an accurate account of what happened.

• Identity cannot be externally confirmed

  No party outside your systems can confirm the machine's identity, limiting trust across the ecosystem.

• Reports are not externally verifiable

  Recipients cannot independently confirm your reports, reducing their value in review.

• Evidence cannot be exported for review

  Evidence is locked inside internal tools, so insurers and auditors cannot examine it.

• No verifiable incident packs

  You cannot produce a verifiable incident evidence pack for a claim or review.

Improvements that do not require AEM — safety, documentation and process changes you own.

• No independent verification

  Only you can verify your evidence, which limits its weight with insurers and courts.

• Insufficient safety stop controls

  Safety-stop capability is limited. This is an operational/process improvement you own — not something AEM provides.